Re: autoconf

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autoconf
Date: 2007-12-05 16:29:09
Message-ID: 20071205162909.GC16991@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Patrick Welche wrote:
> I know that it doesn't matter as configure is in CVS, so there is no
> need for mere mortals to regenerate it, but why is
>
> RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/configure.in,v
> revision 1.538
> date: 2007/11/26 12:31:07; author: petere; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2
> Require a specific Autoconf version, instead of a lower bound only.
>
> a good idea?

To avoid the autoconf version used to regenerate configure from being
changed on a stable tree.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
Tulio: oh, para qué servirá este boton, Juan Carlos?
Policarpo: No, aléjense, no toquen la consola!
Juan Carlos: Lo apretaré una y otra vez.

In response to

  • autoconf at 2007-12-05 16:15:34 from Patrick Welche

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2007-12-05 17:06:41 shared_buffers, wal_buffers, WAL files, data files
Previous Message Walter Cruz 2007-12-05 16:17:11 Re: weird - invalid string enlargement request size