Re: Beta4 patch for index.html and beta.html

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Subject: Re: Beta4 patch for index.html and beta.html
Date: 2007-12-05 04:52:04
Message-ID: 200712042352.05231.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tuesday 04 December 2007 15:07, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 21:03 +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > > Committed (changed "will be at least one more beta" part to "may be
> >
> > at
> >
> > > least...")
> >
> > is that actually the plan - ie having beta5 ?
>
> I don't know core's plan -- and what testing results will be. That's why
> I changed the text from "will be" to "may be".
>

Unfortunatly this mixes the very definitive "due to issues your testing
caught" with something completly speculative "there may be", which lends the
whole thing to being somewhat akwardly worded, especially when you consider
it phrased that way before any beta4 issues are caught. If you really want
to leave a door open, rephrase it like "Depending on the level of bugs
reported, there may be an additional beta before RC1". If you want it to be
a very narrow door, word it like "This will be the last beta before RC1
pending any critical bugs found in user testing". Personally I'd probably
just drop this sentence alltogether.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-05 04:57:29 Re: Fair large change to contributors
Previous Message Robert Treat 2007-12-05 04:44:30 Re: Fair large change to contributors