| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Usama Munir Dar <usama(dot)munir(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)uiuc(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: Training Recommendations |
| Date: | 2007-12-03 18:52:49 |
| Message-ID: | 200712031352.49852.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sunday 02 December 2007 15:26, Usama Munir Dar wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 November 2007 11:20, Usama Munir Dar wrote:
> >> EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com) ofcourse
> >
> > lame :-P
>
> Have you or anyone you know tried the training offerings? or you think
> its lame because i top posted , which of course would be a very poor
> criteria , not to mention completely unrelated, so i definitely think
> its not the reason. i would love to hear whats wrong with it so we can
> work on its improvement
>
What I thought was lame was that you, being someone who works for EntepriseDB,
suggested EnterpriseDB as a solution, with no mention of the other training
options available. Now one guy doing this isn't such a big deal (though it
is still poor practice), but if every training company we're to do this I
think you can see how it doesn't do much for helping the public discourse. Of
course I probably would have let the whole thing slide, but you top posted,
so...
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-12-03 22:14:21 | Re: Dealing with big tables |
| Previous Message | Paul Lindner | 2007-12-03 16:12:22 | Re: Training Recommendations |