| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgresSQL vs Ingress |
| Date: | 2007-11-30 06:59:40 |
| Message-ID: | 200711300159.41130.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 29 November 2007 21:12, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> I was browsing the net yesterday after reading through the thread on PG
> vs Informix and I was curious as to Ingress.
>
> Ingress is also an open source RDBM (and DataWarehouseing) and I'm
> wondering if anyone here has anything to say about it. They also offer
> community editions but I've not gone to see how much it differs/offers
> compared to PG.
>
> I've tried to DL the community edition, but upon log-in, I only get a
> blank page. (tried on both firefox and opera)
>
From a technology standpoint, Ingres is top notch, but it suffers from the
same problem as most of the database solutions available; it is corporate
owned/controlled rather than community owned/controlled.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aarni Ruuhimäki | 2007-11-30 07:02:25 | Recommendations for a datasync scenario ? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-11-30 06:56:13 | Re: Tools for dumping pg_xlog, pg_clog, etc? |