Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: 2007-11-29 01:06:01
Message-ID: 20071129010601.GZ5118@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-patches

David Fetter wrote:

> Greg Sabino Mullane managed to contrive an example where RULEs might
> conceivably be the least-bad way to do this, that being a machine
> where no PLs may be installed.

Perhaps this just means we should consider installing plpgsql by
default.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
"There was no reply" (Kernel Traffic)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-11-29 01:07:49 Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Previous Message David Fetter 2007-11-29 00:53:34 Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-11-29 01:07:49 Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Previous Message David Fetter 2007-11-29 00:53:34 Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules