| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TB-sized databases |
| Date: | 2007-11-28 13:27:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20071128082716.91bbad9c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
In response to Matthew <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Pablo Alcaraz wrote:
> > it would be nice to do something with selects so we can recover a rowset
> > on huge tables using a criteria with indexes without fall running a full
> > scan.
>
> You mean: Be able to tell Postgres "Don't ever do a sequential scan of
> this table. It's silly. I would rather the query failed than have to wait
> for a sequential scan of the entire table."
>
> Yes, that would be really useful, if you have huge tables in your
> database.
Is there something wrong with:
set enable_seqscan = off
?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-28 13:36:48 | Re: GiST indexing tuples |
| Previous Message | Matthew | 2007-11-28 13:08:04 | Re: GiST indexing tuples |