Re: Terminal width for help output

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Terminal width for help output
Date: 2007-11-19 21:39:32
Message-ID: 20071119213932.GP1955@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:56:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's
> > \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
> > have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
>
> 79 is perfect IMHO. It would be great to ask translators to preserve
> the constraint too.

I thought that <79 was good because if output was copied/pasted into an
email that didn't fold lines nicely then output wouldn't get immediately
mangled.

Sam

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-11-20 02:31:06 Re: [HACKERS] fulltext parser strange behave
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2007-11-19 21:34:00 Re: Terminal width for help output