Re: Terminal width for help output

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Terminal width for help output
Date: 2007-11-15 21:02:32
Message-ID: 20071115130232.2fa951cb@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:58:28 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output
> (and psql's \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or
> perhaps 72), but we have a couple of violations either way, which I'd
> like to fix, but what to?

Why not just have the terminal control the wrap? It isn't just \? that
does it.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHPLPqATb/zqfZUUQRAuu9AKCIBLRm0ehiWWW7RYi9zjles97/nACcCQu3
5aIzQRH0navadQQzCE6Xn64=
=tTOa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-15 21:04:46 Re: Terminal width for help output
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-15 21:02:16 Re: Terminal width for help output