Re: pgfoundry is down

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgfoundry is down
Date: 2007-11-14 18:23:41
Message-ID: 20071114182341.GD17557@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:42:44PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
>
> > Question is, where should we host that page?
>
> > I'da say there are two options - either on the main website, which is
> > mirrored globally, or on a completely independent system (not just it's own
> > vm, not even in the same datacenter as our other servers).
>
> +1 for independence. Sound to me like a wiki would be perfect for this
> as well. My company would be happy to host a wiki (or we could port the
> existing one over)

If you port the exiting wiki over, you lose independence, no?

Also, I think a wiki is a major overkill. All we need is a static webpage
that the infrastructure folks can edit, no?
Sure, that can be implemented by a wiki, but it just seems way way more
complicated than needed.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-14 18:27:31 Re: pgfoundry is down
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-11-14 18:11:02 Re: Gborg: announcement by 404