Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto
Date: 2007-11-09 23:43:35
Message-ID: 200711092343.lA9NhZ006419@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 11/7/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > OK, should we add a mention in the 8.2.6 release notes or put it in the
> > 8. notes and figure if someone is upgrading they will read the 8.2
> > notes? What would the description be?
>
> """
> Note about pgcrypto - the functions were made STRICT in 8.1
> and the NULL check was removed in 8.2 from C code. If some
> database still contains non-STRICT signatures from 8.0 and below,
> the functions will crash on NULL. To fix it the pgcrypto.sql
> needs to be run that will re-create the signatures.
> """
>
> Hm. Is there way to say that better?

OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-11-09 23:43:43 Re: Is "query" a reserved word in 8.3 plpgsql?
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2007-11-09 23:39:31 Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto