| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Mentioning Slony in docs |
| Date: | 2007-11-08 15:28:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200711081528.lA8FSYN05094@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to all of
> > the various solutions. This was a reason not to do that.
>
> The reason for taking a "balanced approach" is that no one solution
> fits everyone's needs. I don't think the core docs should be pushing
> Slony more than other solutions.
We do mention Slony for in-place upgrades because if its capabilities to
work across Postgres versions.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-11-08 15:38:29 | The definition of PGDG |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-08 15:22:48 | Re: Mentioning Slony in docs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-11-08 15:38:29 | The definition of PGDG |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-08 15:22:48 | Re: Mentioning Slony in docs |