Re: Mentioning Slony in docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Date: 2007-11-08 09:10:14
Message-ID: 200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs

Am Donnerstag, 8. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we own the code
> and it is of course BSD licenced.

Why is that a reason for mentioning it more prominently? Is "code ownership"
a relevant property?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-08 09:26:01 Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-08 08:10:40 Mentioning Slony in docs

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-08 09:26:01 Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-08 08:10:40 Mentioning Slony in docs