From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Syntax error in a large COPY |
Date: | 2007-11-07 13:31:15 |
Message-ID: | 20071107083115.6f9cc0f6.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> Tom Lane, 07.11.2007 06:14:
> > Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >> If everyone simply top-posted, there would be no need for me to scroll down,
> >> just to find a two line answer below a forty line quote - which I personally
> >> find more irritating than top-posting.
> >
> > I think you're ignoring my basic point, which was that people shouldn't
> > be quoting forty lines' worth in the first place. *Especially* not if
> > they only have two lines to contribute.
>
> No, I did get your point.
>
> My point is: with top-posting I don't care how many lines were repeated
> because I don't have to scroll.
Considering there is an RFC that recommends inline posting over
top-posting (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855) and considering the
fact that this topic has been beat to death on dozens of mailing lists
and the predominant preference is _not_ for top-posting -- perhaps you
should either follow the preferences of the group, or leave the group.
> > But this horse has been beat to death before...
Obviously not, as it keeps coming back to life. I guess it's an
undead horse?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-07 13:36:54 | Re: Syntax error in a large COPY |
Previous Message | Reg Me Please | 2007-11-07 12:54:36 | Re: Postgresql simple query performance question |