Re: pg_ctl configurable timeout

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl configurable timeout
Date: 2007-11-05 14:23:24
Message-ID: 20071105142324.GA7428@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I think the mythical pg_ping utility should be written. It seems the
> > easiest way out of the problem.
>
> If pg_ctl were still a shell script there would be some point in that,
> but since it's a C program it can certainly do anything a separate
> utility would do.

Well, pg_ctl would not be the only user of such an utility. Things like
(say) control panels for shared hosting could benefit from it as well.
As would system health monitors.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2007-11-05 14:34:34 Re: Fwd: Clarification about HOT
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-11-05 14:19:51 Re: Fwd: Clarification about HOT

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-05 15:23:16 Re: [RFC] extended txid docs
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-11-05 01:11:53 Consistent \d commands in psql