| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Reg Me Please <regmeplease(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INDEX and JOINs |
| Date: | 2007-10-26 13:02:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20071026130221.GD24394@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Reg Me Please wrote:
> > >----------------------------------------------------- Hash Join
> > > (cost=3.95..382140.91 rows=274709 width=91) (actual
> > > time=1.929..57713.305 rows=92 loops=1)
> > > Hash Cond: (t_dati.camp_id = t_campi.camp_id)
>
> prove=# \d t_dati
Ok, my suggestion would be to run it with "enable_seqscan=off" and if
that is indeed faster, then try reducing random_page_cost.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-26 13:18:04 | Re: INDEX and JOINs |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-26 12:47:06 | Re: Query_time SQL as a function w/o creating a new type |