| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3 GSS Issues |
| Date: | 2007-10-25 12:26:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20071025122647.GD5661@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:51:04PM -0700, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> > At the risk of diluting my message: I still think it's a mistake to
> > call it gss instead of something like gss-noprot. I believe this
> > will cause misunderstandings in the future when we get the security
> > layer of gssapi implemented.
>
> Well, I don't agree with this, but if others want it changed, it can
> certainly be changed. And it can only be changed *now*, and not once we
> release.
>
> But we have "host" and "hostssl", not "hostnossl" and "host". So the way we
> are donig it now is IMO more consistent with what we have in other parts of pg.
Actually we have "hostssl", "hostnossl" and "host".
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-10-25 13:06:09 | Re: 8.3 GSS Issues |
| Previous Message | Hubert FONGARNAND | 2007-10-25 11:49:57 | Re: PostGreSQL and zlib |