From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: dblink un-named connection doesn't get re-used |
Date: | 2007-10-23 22:09:39 |
Message-ID: | 200710232209.l9NM9dG11683@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, R, 2007-10-19 kell 15:42, kirjutas Joe Conway:
> > Decibel! wrote:
> > > On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Seriously though, I can change it for 8.3, but is it really worth
> > >> back-patching?
> > >
> > > I think it'd be worth changing for 8.3. While C forces you to worry
> > > about memory, SQL does not, so I bet this is a surprise to most folks.
> >
> > I don't think anyone has ever noticed -- certainly not enough to
> > complain in the past 5 years. This behavior has been the same since day
> > one. I don't mind changing it, but I don't see it as a big deal.
>
> Most likely nobody ever uses un-named connection beyond initial testing.
>
> --------------
> Hannu
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-23 22:15:58 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-23 22:09:00 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |