Re: Ready for beta2?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Ready for beta2?
Date: 2007-10-22 13:51:52
Message-ID: 20071022135152.GJ15375@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:25:03AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Sunday 21 October 2007 22:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
> > >
> > > Getting Beta2 out is vital to actually getting people to test there are
> > > known issues and changes with Beta1 that have made it pretty much a
> > > useless Beta.
> >
> > Agreed --- at this point we know we've forced initdb, plus there are
> > those known locale issues on Windows, so it's a bit hard to ask someone
> > to install beta1 if they haven't already. I think what we need to do
> > next is get to closure on the open issues and get a beta2 out ASAP.
> <snip>
> > Can anyone think of any other issues that should be considered beta2
> > stoppers? (No, the contrib documentation isn't one...)
> >
>
> There was talk that the txid contrib module could be folded into core should
> we do an initdb post beta; has that idea been revisted now that we have?

Yes. It has been folded in.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00246.php

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roberto Icardi 2007-10-22 13:56:07 Re: pgadmin debug on windows
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2007-10-22 13:40:46 Re: PostgreSQL performance issues