From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5? |
Date: | 2007-10-18 04:49:01 |
Message-ID: | 200710172149.01326.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 21:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm writing up the new GUCs, and noticed that max_prepared_transactions
> > defaults to 5. This is too many for most applications (which don't use
> > them at all) and far too few for applications which use them regularly.
>
> I think the intention was to have enough so you could test 'em (in
> particular, run the regression tests) without eating resources for
> the majority of installations that aren't using them.
>
> Certainly an installation that *is* using 'em would want a higher
> setting.
Yeah, given the amount of memory per xact, I guess we can't actually set the
default higher. I just hate to see a setting that is liable to bite someone
on the tuchas so easily.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-18 05:00:34 | Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-18 04:35:42 | Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5? |