Re: Vacuum goes worse

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Brian Herlihy <btherl(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
Date: 2007-10-17 03:19:51
Message-ID: 20071016201951.267b066d@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Brian Herlihy <btherl(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

> Would it make sense to show the FSM stats for individual table
> vaccums as well? I'm wondering if the reason they aren't shown is
> because it wouldn't be useful or isn't practical, or just that it
> hasn't been done.

I am not sure how useful it would be as the FSM is global. However what
would be useful is something like VACUUM SUMMARY, where I could get
"just" the stats instead of all the other output that comes along with
VERBOSE.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Brian
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>
> If you're talking about the FSM statistics display, that only gets
> printed by a database-wide VACUUM (one that doesn't name a specific
> table).
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase
> your free space map settings
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcin Stępnicki 2007-10-17 05:32:47 Re: using a stored proc that returns a result set in a complex SQL stmt
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-17 01:16:01 Re: Vacuum goes worse