Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>
Cc: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
Date: 2007-10-11 15:14:01
Message-ID: 20071011151401.GC20687@crankycanuck.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:31:44AM -0500, Roberts, Jon wrote:

> The cost is significantly lower but the total runtime is higher.

Um, so you want developers to change the thing so that it performs
more slowly, but has a prettier estimate of how much work it's going
to do? That seems like a poor optimisation to me.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roberts, Jon 2007-10-11 15:42:51 Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
Previous Message Nathanael TERRIEN 2007-10-11 14:19:03 BUG #3671: if locale=french, service idles at 100% CPU