Re: [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?

Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 9/29/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I think we need more than one person's request to add this function.
>
> Well, I don't expect it would get requested. Most DBAs would likely
> look for the function in the docs, see it's not there and then just
> implement it themselves. Obviously it's not critical. But
> anticipating those little requirements and providing for them is one
> of the things that makes a piece of software a pleasure to use.
> "Batteries included" and all that.

I was just looking for someone else to say "Yea, I would like that too".

> Anyway, I seem to be flogging a horse which, if not dead, is surely
> mortally wounded. If quote_qualified_ident isn't desired, perhaps you
> can still use the regression test I included for quote_ident in the
> patch. The test is functional as a standalone item, and seems to fill
> a gap.

Well, we don't test everything and I don't remember problems in quoting
in the past, at least not enough to add another test.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +