Re: Using Postgres as an alias

From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using Postgres as an alias
Date: 2007-10-01 08:38:02
Message-ID: 20071001103802.8f700ab9.adsmail@wars-nicht.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:33:38 -0700 David Fetter wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:11:52AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In an attempt to get "Postgres" more widely used, I propose changing
> > "PostgreSQL" to "Postgres" in the documentation when there is more
> > than one mention of "PostgreSQL" in the same paragraph. The same
> > could be done with the FAQ.
> >
> > Objections?
>
> +1 :)

-1

By the way, David: your last PWN does not even contain one "PostgreSQL"
at all in the text which is written by you. Imho Bruce mentioned something else.

Oh, and thanks for breaking my brand new translation script ;-)

Kind regards

--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
(Ferenc Mantfeld)

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-10-01 18:15:42 PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007, final schedule
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2007-10-01 02:41:26 Re: Using Postgres as an alias