Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Date: 2007-09-29 12:23:46
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Friday 28 September 2007 13:18, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
> > Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
> Except then it'll regularly get misspelled as Digress. And
> pronounced Dee'-gray.
> I think we should call it Gerwuffle. Like, "Yeah, go install that
> Gerwuffle over there, and twiddle the thingy, and you'll be set to
> go."
> Or, of course, we can do what certain other parties with previous
> renaming problems did. We can be The Database Formerly Known as
> Postgres. Then when someone complains about confusion with the
> PostQUEL-using version of the code, we can just become The Database.
> That oughta clear up any confusion, eh?

Then CMD could be "The" The Database Company.

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-09-29 16:55:03 Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-09-29 11:12:40 Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.