Re: Using Postgres as an alias

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Using Postgres as an alias
Date: 2007-09-27 19:53:32
Message-ID: 20070927195332.GA306@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Joshua D. Drake escribió:

> No. The goal was to "accept" Postgres as an alternate name. There is
> very clearly a difference between "accepting" something and "promoting"
> something.

Postgres has been accepted as an alternative name for years.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-09-27 19:58:38 Re: Using Postgres as an alias
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2007-09-27 19:52:34 Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.