Re: Regarding COPY command from Postgres 8.2.0

From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <lists(at)planetcobalt(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regarding COPY command from Postgres 8.2.0
Date: 2007-09-14 12:03:21
Message-ID: 20070914120321.GA2615@mail.planetcobalt.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 2007-09-14 soni de wrote:
> In Postgres 7.2.4, COPY command is working fine even if tables have 6
> fields but we are copying only 5 fields from the file
>
> But in Postgres 8.2.0, if table has 6 fields and we need to copy data
> for 5 fields only, then we need to specify the column names too in
> COPY command.
>
> Is there any configurable option, so that without specifying column
> name in COPY command we can copy records in table as happened in
> Postgres 7.2.4?

I don't know if it is possible, but even if it were I'd strongly
recommend against it, as you'd be relying on the order the columns were
created in. That's a rather bad idea IMHO. Why would you want to avoid
giving the names of the columns in the first place?

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"The Mac OS X kernel should never panic because, when it does, it
seriously inconveniences the user."
--http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2004/tn2118.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-David Beyer 2007-09-14 13:22:08 Re: Index files
Previous Message db 2007-09-14 11:31:45 Re: Long Running Commits - Not Checkpoints