From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Ben Tilly <btilly(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL feature requests |
Date: | 2007-09-14 04:03:04 |
Message-ID: | 200709140403.l8E434d24659@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Chuck McDevitt wrote:
> > PostgreSQL already has a huge amount of
> > "non-standard" syntax and semantics (perhaps "extensions" is a better
> > word?).
> > Everything from non-standard cast operator, non-standard substr,
> > non-standard trim, non standard group by semantics (allowing simple ints
> > to mean column number)... Given a day, we could probably write down
> > several pages of "non-standard" features of PGSQL.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Quite so, and I've perpetrated a few myself. But for the most part they
> are either there for legacy reasons or add significant extra functionality.
>
> I rather like Alvaro's compromise suggestion re aliases in fact. At
> least there seems to be a better case for that than for "group by 'blurfl'".
>
> But the argument that convinces me is not that it follows some de facto
> standard, but that it would add to clarity. Requiring an alias where it
> isn't used seems to me a piece of less than excellent design.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-14 04:12:04 | Re: Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-14 03:59:23 | Re: Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention |