From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Still recommending daily vacuum... |
Date: | 2007-09-13 23:44:18 |
Message-ID: | 200709132344.l8DNiIR24683@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> From
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/routine-vacuuming.html :
>
> "Recommended practice for most sites is to schedule a database-wide
> VACUUM once a day at a low-usage time of day, supplemented by more
> frequent vacuuming of heavily-updated tables if necessary. (Some
> installations with extremely high update rates vacuum their busiest
> tables as often as once every few minutes.) If you have multiple
> databases in a cluster, don't forget to VACUUM each one; the program
> vacuumdb might be helpful."
>
> Do we still want that to be our formal recommendation? ISTM it would be
> more logical to recommend a combination of autovac, daily vacuumdb -a if
> you can afford it and have a quiet period, and frequent manual vacuuming
> of things like web session tables.
>
> I'm happy to come up with a patch, but I figure there should be
> consensus first...
I have applied the following patch to emphasize autovacuum rather than
administrator-scheduled vacuums.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 6.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-13 23:49:21 | Re: plpgsql and qualified variable names |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-13 23:29:52 | Re: Another HOT thought: why do we need indcreatexid at all? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-13 23:56:20 | Re: WIP: rewrite numeric division |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-13 20:20:44 | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |