Re: Attempt to stop dead instance can stop a random process?

From: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Attempt to stop dead instance can stop a random process?
Date: 2007-09-01 04:49:54
Message-ID: 20070901044954.GA17405@www.trapp.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 02:41:47PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:

[...]

> > The real question there is how come the postmaster died without removing
> > the pidfile. It's not that easy to crash the postmaster ...
>
> Well, that's not due to a bug in PostgreSQL. We're using a buggy LDAP
> implementation (not my call) which can crash things. The machine totally
> locked up after logging distress messages from that daemon, and they cycled
> power to get out of it.

Hm. I've come to expect the OS removing all pidfiles early at bootup. A
pidfile from the "last incarnation" doesn't make much sense anyway,
right?

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG2O9yBcgs9XrR2kYRAjB1AJ99MwT7M4LCDCTm/lnoCQE+xxVq5wCdEfDN
j+/jC3DI3qr/W1OEJGDAg88=
=pCGj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-01 04:57:35 Re: Attempt to stop dead instance can stop a random process?
Previous Message August Zajonc 2007-09-01 04:30:12 Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2