Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
Date: 2007-08-30 11:39:00
Message-ID: 200708301239000000@1548318574
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> Sent: 30/08/07, 09:02:40
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007)

> Second, what does that refer to? AFAIK, we "refer to ourselves" as PGDG?
> In what way is this other designation diferent?

Afaik, neither PGDG or those that look after postgresql.org have agreed or discussed a conference in any of the usual forums.

I assume Josh meant to say that PDXPUG had organised a public event.

/D

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-30 15:14:34 Re: PostgreSQL.Org
Previous Message Federico 2007-08-30 11:18:10 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)