Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007)

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007)
Date: 2007-08-30 08:02:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-announcepgsql-general
(this is not actually about the conference, but..)

On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:28:30PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> PostgreSQL.Org is having a one day technical conference in Portland,

What the heck is PostgreSQL.Org? Two things:

First, our domain is Not PostgreSQL.Org. That just looks
weird and ugly, really. I thought we had previously agreed on not messing
it up like that?

Second, what does that refer to? AFAIK, we "refer to ourselves" as PGDG?
In what way is this other designation different?


In response to


pgsql-announce by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-08-30 15:14:34
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.Org
Previous:From: Stuart CooperDate: 2007-08-30 00:55:52
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2007-08-30 09:05:59
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous:From: Gabriele BartoliniDate: 2007-08-30 07:37:43
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ow Mun HengDate: 2007-08-30 08:03:40
Subject: accessing PG using Perl:DBI
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2007-08-30 08:01:19
Subject: Re: Out of Memory - 8.2.4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group