| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Stephen Ince" <since(at)opendemand(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
| Date: | 2007-08-27 21:10:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200708272210050000@095729690 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Stephen Ince" <since(at)opendemand(dot)com>
> To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 27/08/07, 21:30:06
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
>
> Dave,
> Thx I will take a look. I was trying to port a postgres schema to a
> database that had embedded capability. I could not find any non-commerical
> databases that supported triggers, sequences, udf function, and stored
> procedure. I as I remembered firebird has pretty weak UDF function
> capability(only C/C++) and the name size limitation was a killer.
>
SQL CE is pretty limited as well - no sequences, triggers or udf's either. It works very well with .Net CF of course and is a very useful datastore on pocket pc device though.
.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-27 21:14:55 | Re: pgsql Windows installer fixed registry key |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-27 21:08:22 | Re: Tables dissapearing |