From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jay Morris" <Jay(dot)Morris(at)noaa(dot)gov>, "pgAdmin Support" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Redhat 4.0 |
Date: | 2007-08-19 21:00:01 |
Message-ID: | 200708192200010000@601928065 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 19/08/07, 11:40:34
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Redhat 4.0
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 08:44 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > Which version should I try to get installed?
> >
> > I'd have said that one. What errors did you get? Devrim, should the FC
> > RPMs work on RHEL?
>
> No.
OK.
> I (at last) built and uploaded RHEL 4 RPMs. They are on developer site;
> will sync to main FTP site soon. I could not test the RPMS (it can be
> installed though). I'll be happy if someone downloads them and install.
Thanks Devrim.
> I applied two small patches to pgadmin3 source code to build on RHEL 4.
> pgadmin3 requires libxml2 >= 2.6.18 to build -- but RHEL has 2.6.16. I
> patched acinclude.m4 and configure so that it looks for 2.6.16 ;)
Err, that check was added on purpose - part of libxml2 < 2.6.18 is broken. I added the code to acinclude.m4 to ensure we would only link with a library that works.
Is RHEL really that far behind? 2.6.18 has been around for ages.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-08-19 21:39:17 | Re: Redhat 4.0 |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-08-19 10:40:34 | Re: Redhat 4.0 |