Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
Date: 2007-08-14 22:34:14
Message-ID: 20070814223413.GY54135@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:16:15PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> > I did't test MySQL three years, But three years ago, MySQL rollback
> > was really, really slow.
>
> Based on recent testing I did, rollbacks are very expensive -- like 3x to 4x
> the cost of the original insert in high-concurrency environments. Also not
> always reliable (as of 5.0).

Wow, that's a serious gotcha. If there's a way to reproduce that we
should certainly let Ian Barwick of MySQL gotchas fame know about it.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-08-14 23:47:56 Re: 12 Silver Bullets
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-08-14 22:25:52 Re: 12 Silver Bullets