Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Date: 2007-08-02 16:35:28
Message-ID: 200708020935.28823.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> I don't actually think that what Jignesh is testing is a particularly
> realistic scenario, and so I object to making performance decisions on
> the strength of that one measurement.

What do you mean by "not realistic"? What would be a realistic scenario?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-02 16:50:00 Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-02 16:08:18 Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?