Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish
Date: 2007-07-24 17:55:57
Message-ID: 20070724175557.GA3926@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> While I don't have any very strong objection to putting an ORDER BY
> on these particular queries, I'm worried about how many other regression
> tests will now start showing random failures. We have an awful lot
> of small tables in the tests ...

Maybe what we could do is set higher thresholds for the regression
database with ALTER DATABASE.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-07-24 17:56:14 Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-07-24 17:44:14 Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish