Re: Future of krb5 authentication

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Future of krb5 authentication
Date: 2007-07-18 18:25:41
Message-ID: 20070718182541.GX4887@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> No, no requirement. But you would certainly expect it to use it if you
> have SSL on the connection.

Uhh, perhaps, but my recollection is that it's generally *not* done that
way in other things.. Honestly, it doesn't matter to me, just wanted to
clear up the implication.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2007-07-18 18:28:34 Re: Future of krb5 authentication
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-18 18:08:26 Re: Updated tsearch documentation