| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS |
| Date: | 2007-07-17 00:38:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200707170038.l6H0cGG01332@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Allow multiple indexes to be created concurrently, ideally via a
> > single heap scan, and have a restore of a pg_dump somehow use it
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-05/msg01274.php
>
>
> Would it not also make sense to use this ability for a
> non-index-specific REINDEX command?
Not sure, but I suppose.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-17 01:43:53 | Re: Issues with PL/PGSQL function.. |
| Previous Message | Shoaib Mir | 2007-07-17 00:35:38 | Re: Issues with PL/PGSQL function.. |