Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10?

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de>
Cc: Anton Melser <melser(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10?
Date: 2007-07-12 09:46:46
Message-ID: 20070712094646.GA18567@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:04:38AM +0200, Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> This god like faith of some admins in package maintainers, that they
> know what's right, good and stable for them, sometimes really worries me.

The problem is the mismatch between what distrbuters want and what the
postgres team wants. For distributors "stable" means no behavioural
changes, whereas the postgresql team does bug fixes, some of which
definitly make behavioural changes that would make previously working
programs break.

Backports is usually a good compromise.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Allison 2007-07-12 10:17:40 Mac OS X
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-07-12 08:57:40 Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error