Re: 'SET LOCAL ROLE blah;' doesn't work?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 'SET LOCAL ROLE blah;' doesn't work?
Date: 2007-06-29 02:14:01
Message-ID: 20070629021401.GN32626@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> and the postmaster log has
>
> 2007-06-28 22:02:14.418 EDT 2870 LOG: statement: begin;
> 2007-06-28 22:02:26.044 EDT 2870 LOG: statement: SAVEPOINT pg_psql_temporary_savepoint
> 2007-06-28 22:02:26.045 EDT 2870 LOG: statement: set local role tgl;
> 2007-06-28 22:02:26.047 EDT 2870 LOG: statement: RELEASE pg_psql_temporary_savepoint
> 2007-06-28 22:02:57.545 EDT 2870 LOG: statement: SAVEPOINT pg_psql_temporary_savepoint
> 2007-06-28 22:02:57.546 EDT 2870 LOG: statement: show role;
> 2007-06-28 22:02:57.548 EDT 2870 LOG: statement: RELEASE pg_psql_temporary_savepoint
>
> So actually, ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK breaks *any* use of SET LOCAL, not just
> ROLE. Not sure that this is fixable :-(

Maybe if psql sees "SET LOCAL" it shouldn't send the RELEASE command.
But it seems a bit error prone to be finding each command that may be
affected by RELEASE ... what other thing do we have that works at the
level of subtransactions?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2007-06-29 02:24:19 Re: 'SET LOCAL ROLE blah;' doesn't work?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-29 02:06:09 Re: 'SET LOCAL ROLE blah;' doesn't work?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2007-06-29 02:24:19 Re: 'SET LOCAL ROLE blah;' doesn't work?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-29 02:06:09 Re: 'SET LOCAL ROLE blah;' doesn't work?