Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-22 16:14:12
Message-ID: 200706221814.14979.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2007 15:34 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> Consider even if we are clear that "min" is "minutes", it could be
> chronological minutes or radial degree minutes, so yea, the context has
> to be considered.

The correct symbol for an arc minute is ´, so there is no context dependency.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-06-22 16:16:34 Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-22 15:52:42 Re: tsearch in core patch