Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-21 14:06:03
Message-ID: 200706211606.05480.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 15:12 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> You don't seem to have any understanding that the units should be
> interpreted in context.

You are right. I definitely have an understanding that units must be
interpretable without context. And that clearly works for the most part.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-06-21 15:03:17 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2007-06-21 13:55:45 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent