Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-20 20:37:37
Message-ID: 200706202037.l5KKbb012930@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2007 05:54 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > Agreed. ?I don't see the point in following a standard few people know
> > about.
>
> Yes, let's drop SQL as well.

If SQL was not a popular standard, we would drop it. You and Alvaro are
saying that 'm' for meter and 'min' for minute is commonly recognized
outside the USA/UK, so that is good enough for me to say that the
existing setup is fine.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-20 20:44:14 Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-20 20:24:11 Re: Updated tsearch documentation