Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues
Date: 2007-06-15 11:42:06
Message-ID: 200706150742.06809.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Friday 15 June 2007 00:46, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> > [ thinks some more... ] If we revived the GENERATED AS patch,
> > you could imagine computing tsvector columns via "GENERATED AS
> > to_tsvector('english'::regconfig, big_text_col)" instead of a
> > trigger, and then again you've got the dependency exposed where
> > the system can see it. I don't wanna try to do that for 8.3,
> > but it might be a good path to pursue in future, instead of assuming
> > that triggers will be the way forevermore.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> No way with standard. GENERATED AS says that "all columns references in an
> expression associated with a generated column must be to columns of the
> base table containing that generated column."
>
> tsvector could be result of rather complex select involving several tables.
>

Is there some reason for this restriction in the standard? I might be in
favor of "extending" the standard to allow this case if not.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-15 14:15:31 Re: How does the tsearch configuration get selected?
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2007-06-15 10:32:16 Re: How does the tsearch configuration get selected?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-06-15 12:26:26 Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2007-06-15 11:11:57 Re: [PATCHES] Load Distributed Checkpoints, revised patch