From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Truncate Permission |
Date: | 2007-06-13 14:54:01 |
Message-ID: | 20070613145401.GZ7531@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> "Nicholas Barr" <nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > At the moment it seems as if a single 32 bit integer is used for the
> > permissions, with the top half being the grantable rights. I assume I
> > would need to extend this into two 32 bit integers, or one 64 bit integer?
>
> Two 32-bit please. We are still trying not to depend on 64-bit
> arithmetic for any core functionality.
Agreed. Also, most of the time you'll only be pulling in the first one
(for a permissions check). The second would only ever be used when a
'GRANT' is done.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-06-13 14:54:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-06-13 14:49:18 | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |