Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Date: 2007-06-07 15:50:36
Message-ID: 20070607155036.GH92628@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:04:26AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The launcher is set up to wake up in autovacuum_naptime seconds at most.
> So if the user configures a ridiculuos time (for example 86400 seconds,
> which I've seen) then the launcher would not detect the postmaster death

Yeah, I've seen people set that up with the intention of "now autovacuum
will only run during our slow time!". I'm thinking it'd be worth
mentioning in the docs that this won't work, and instead suggesting that
they run vacuumdb -a or equivalent at that time instead. Thoughts?
--
Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-07 15:53:36 Re: [BUGS] BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-07 15:44:15 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Create a GUC parametertemp_tablespacesthat allows selection of

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-07 15:53:36 Re: [BUGS] BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-07 14:16:25 Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints