Re: Transactional DDL

On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:51:13PM -0400, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> my bad.. i replied to that in a wrong thread. sorry

That is one of many reasons that smart people don't top post. Had you
decided not to top post, you would have realized instantly that you
were in the wrong thread.

If there is a word or phrase in the above that you do not understand,
please feel free to ask, but blithely continuing to top post will get
you a reputation you don't want.

Regards,
David.
>
> On 6/2/07, Leif B. Kristensen <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> >On Saturday 2. June 2007 20:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>You were politely asked not to top-post.
> >>
> >>On 06/02/07 11:46, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> >>> So, while writing any technical document, would it be wrong to
> >>> mention stored procedures in postgresql?
> >>> what is the general convention?
> >>
> >>Did I miss something? What does "stored procedures" have to do with
> >> "Transactional DDL"?
> >
> >I believe that he posted this in reply to the "Stored procedures and
> >functions" thread. It kind of fits in there.
> >--
> >Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009
> >http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE
> >My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> > match
> >

--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate