| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: multimaster |
| Date: | 2007-06-01 19:44:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20070601194431.GO24299@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:50:09AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> What you are basically saying below is... web 2.0 developers such as
> rails developers have so fundamentally broken the way it is supposed to
> be done, we should too...
I don't know that's all there is to it. After all, we support arrays
in the database, which ought to make any relational purist shudder.
It seems to me that there _are_ legitimate limits to single-back-end
approaches, even for well designed systems, and being able to spread
some of that load around would be a big advantage. I just don't want
to do it without thinking hard about what the compromises might be,
and figuring out which ones to make. "Breaks transactional model",
for instance, is right out :)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-01 19:50:55 | Re: Slightly OT. |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-01 19:42:22 | Re: multimaster (was: Slightly OT.) |