| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Padding on 64-bit |
| Date: | 2007-05-30 20:00:40 |
| Message-ID: | 200705302000.l4UK0eA05193@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO:
* Consider allowing 64-bit integers to be passed by reference on 64-bit
platforms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-29-05 at 16:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > (I imagine someday we'll get around to allowing int8 to be pass-by-value
> > on 64-bit platforms.)
>
> This could really be a significant performance win: I'm planning to take
> a look at doing it for 8.4.
>
> -Neil
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-30 20:02:47 | Re: Padding on 64-bit |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-05-30 19:59:06 | Re: Ye olde drop-the-database-you-just-left problem |