Re: Padding on 64-bit

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Padding on 64-bit
Date: 2007-05-30 20:00:40
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Added to TODO:

* Consider allowing 64-bit integers to be passed by reference on 64-bit


Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-29-05 at 16:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > (I imagine someday we'll get around to allowing int8 to be pass-by-value
> > on 64-bit platforms.)
> This could really be a significant performance win: I'm planning to take
> a look at doing it for 8.4.
> -Neil
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-05-30 20:02:47 Re: Padding on 64-bit
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-05-30 19:59:06 Re: Ye olde drop-the-database-you-just-left problem